We all “know” at this point that smoking cigarettes are terrible for you. It’s on each bunch of smokes that you purchase. It’s on billboards all around the school. It’s in our TV commercials. We’re continually bombarded from nearly every supply that tobacco is harmful to us… but wait… a thing does not make sense. When ephedrine was found to be harmful to you, it was instantly made illegal, however, cigarettes continue to be legal? How about the age limit? Why is it alright to smoke at 18 but not at 17? Is our body actually prepared for tobacco by the time we are 18, however, not before? One thing is certainly quirky. As you continue reading you are going to take a part of our adventure as we search for the reality about tobacco.

Our initial obstacle was locating a credible source which said something great about tobacco. We spent much of research time searching for such resources. We did find a couple of tobacco studies which confirmed that tobacco is probably the ideal choice for stopping Parkinson’s disease. You hear that perfect, tobacco not only lowers the risks of getting Parkinson’s disease but removed the chance altogether. As our search continued we kept finding far more sources which supported the Parkinson’s illness learn we discovered earlier. Then we stumbled upon research completed by Harvard Clinical Research Institute which absolutely stunned us. The institute discovered that tobacco is actually Beneficial to the heart! I know we’d to reread the study a few times ourselves to ultimately believe it. Where’s the press coverage on that? I mean this’s news that is great. As much as I know, smoking will be the root cause of half, cancer, and heart disease of the sicknesses available today, but here’s research from maybe most reputable clinic of everything that discovers that tobacco is really beneficial? What’s going on?

Here’s one thing that does not make sense. With all the marketing strategies which are in your face about how exactly horrid tobacco is, the quantity of smokers has substantially reduced within the last 20 years. The quantity of cancer and heart disease, including lung as well as mouth cancers, has increased…why? Where’s the correlation here? So we dig much deeper. We find one unusual discovery in Sweden. Apparently, kids whose parents smoke have LESS of a possibility of getting asthma than kids whose parents don’t smoke? At this time I’m utterly confused… what’s going on? Why am I finding a great deal credible info which fully contradicts what I’ve always been informed and know to be accurate about tobacco? Where’s the missing portion? I undergo the reports which support that smoking is not healthy and at last, get a clue. These anti-smoking studies work with subjects that smoke brand name cigarettes. I went to the original studies that I discovered that had pro-tobacco finds and recognized that the pro-tobacco studies work with pure, newly grown tobacco leaf. So my next issue was, “Are cigarettes terrible because the brand name companies add products on the tobacco?” That nevertheless does not clarify my earlier question, so why do we’ve much more heart and cancer problems in case the general population is smoking less?

I chose to begin with taking a look at what exactly do the primary 2 tobacco businesses use within their cigarettes and why? This search took me down an additional rabbit trail. I tried going towards the business websites which yielded nothing useful though they do state they put ingredients for taste and maintenance purposes. They do list a number of the most common elements used by the majority of cigarette companies though express that they won’t list all ingredients because of brand secrets… well that has been a misuse of time… I backtracked and tried going through the faculty queries that finally yielded what I needed.

Apparently, the material used in the main brands is… I can’t think of a word bad adequate to describe it. Here’s just a PARTIAL list: arsenic that can be used in rat poison; acetic acid that is utilized in hair dye and picture developer; acetone which will be the primary component in color & fingernail polish remover; ammonia that is the average home cleaner; benzene used in rubberized cement; cadmium that is present in batteries as well as artists’ oil color; hydrazine used in jet as well as rocket fuels; formaldehyde that can be used to embalm old bodies; hydrogen cyanide that would be the toxins utilized in gas chambers; naphthalenes used in paint pigments, mothballs, and explosives; nickel used in the procedure for electroplating; phenol used in plastics and disinfectants; polonium light, the dosage is the same as 3 100 chest x rays in one year; toluene that is am embalmer’s glue. As I go down this list, I can’t help but shudder… exactly why? Precisely why would anybody want to incorporate these substances into something used for human consumption? In addition to that, precisely how on the planet does the FDA allow for such merchandise to be introduced to the public? This’s becoming irritating as the more I look the more questions I’ve and also the fewer credible sources start to be available… in reality, I can’t discover any credible source which can respond to the why…

And so just where do we go from here? It seems quite , does not it? Fresh tobacco leaf has these side effects: none (well, except the smell); and also has these benefits: stops breast cancer, stops a specific type of skin cancer, reduces anxiety, aids in weight reduction, stops Parkinson’s, decelerates the further advancement of Alzheimer’s, so the list goes on. Brand name tobacco has these side effects: lung cancers, mouth cancers, almost every other cancer; covers your lungs in a horrible tar which really makes it tougher for you to breathing, and the list goes on… The positives? Not a lot. I still cannot state that tobacco is good for yourself but maybe it does not need to kill you.